IS JASON FLOWERS CRAZY — OR JUST MISUNDERSTOOD?

After nearly a year of allegations, police reports, court filings and restrictions, Flowers is asking a simpler question: When does he actually get to answer for himself?

A Buried Secrets Media Investigation
Published October 2, 2026
Hosted by Value Savings Club

There is an old rule of fairness that sounds simple enough: before reaching a conclusion about someone, hear both sides.

For Jason Flowers, that principle has become increasingly complicated.

Over the past year, allegations concerning Flowers have appeared in court filings, police reports and communications involving his daughter's school. Those allegations have touched on his mental health, parenting, social-media activity, personal safety, and — in one of the stranger elements of the dispute — videos and writings involving time travel.

Flowers disputes the characterizations and says many of the claims have either been contradicted by later evidence, never resulted in criminal charges, or have yet to be fully tested at the evidentiary hearing that was supposed to provide him an opportunity to respond.

Now another institution has entered the story: Walled Lake Consolidated Schools.

And Flowers wants to know something surprisingly basic:

What exactly has the school been told about him — and why didn't anyone ask him?

It Started With an Email Flowers Wasn't Supposed to See

A September 24 email from Walled Lake Western administrator Bronson Goodsell has become central to Flowers's questions.

In the email, Goodsell wrote that when Flowers attended football practices in late August, coaches asked him to leave. Goodsell further stated that coaches reported Flowers had not attended additional practices afterward and explained that adults working with student-athletes must receive appropriate approval.

The email did not say Flowers was prohibited from attending public football games.

It did not accuse Flowers of threatening anyone.

And it did not describe a confrontation involving violence.

Instead, the communication occurred after Lisa Sperry contacted Goodsell asking for confirmation that school personnel had been made aware of the situation involving Flowers.

Goodsell responded that he had shared the additional information with the school's deputy and administrative team.

That distinction matters.

Flowers is now asking whether Goodsell was simply communicating the school's ordinary rules concerning participation in practices — or whether the district has effectively imposed a broader restriction concerning Flowers without notifying him.

Rogue athletic director — or district policy?

That is the question.

And at this point, Buried Secrets Media does not have enough information to answer it.

Flowers Says Nobody From the District Asked for His Side

Flowers is not a stranger walking into the district with no connection to it.

He is the parent of a student in Walled Lake Consolidated Schools.

He receives ordinary school communications through the district and has access to Skyward, the system used by families for school information.

Yet Flowers says that despite school officials apparently being aware of concerns surrounding him, no administrator has contacted him to ask what happened, request his response to the allegations, or formally explain what restrictions — if any — the district believes apply to him.

Flowers says his interactions with school personnel have not involved threats or physical confrontations.

He acknowledges one tense interaction with a coach during a practice. Flowers says he believed the coach spoke disrespectfully to him, Flowers immediately objected to the manner in which he was addressed, and explained that he had already communicated with another coach.

That encounter, Flowers maintains, ended there.

So he wants the district to answer a straightforward question:

What has Jason Flowers actually done at Walled Lake Western that justifies treating him as a safety concern?

To Understand That Question, You Have to Go Back to November 2025

Court and law-enforcement records reviewed by Buried Secrets Media show that serious allegations were made against Flowers beginning in November 2025.

Attorney Jeffrey R. Davis, representing Sperry, filed a verified emergency motion seeking to immediately suspend Flowers's parenting time, require therapeutic counseling for the child, require Flowers to undergo a psychiatric evaluation, and obtain additional relief including attorney fees. Pasted markdown(20260818-191519)

Among the allegations was Flowers's creation of videos discussing underground bunkers and time travel. Pasted markdown(20260818-195625)

Yes.

Time travel.

That is not a joke added to this article.

Time travel became part of a family-court filing.

But there is an important distinction that can easily disappear as documents move from one institution to another:

A court filing containing an allegation is not a judicial finding that the allegation is true.

Flowers maintains that creative content, unusual ideas and statements made during a turbulent period were stripped of context and subsequently presented as evidence of mental instability.

Sperry and her attorneys have taken a different position, citing Flowers's behavior and statements as part of their expressed concerns for the child.

Those competing accounts are exactly what an evidentiary process is supposed to examine.

Then Came the Emergency Order

The court acted.

A November 2025 interim ex-parte order suspended Flowers's parenting time pending an emergency hearing. Pasted markdown(20260818-191519)

Following the November 24 proceeding, the matter was referred for a referee evidentiary hearing, Flowers was required to undergo a psychological evaluation, and interim parenting-time restrictions remained in place. Pasted markdown(20260818-195625)

Flowers strongly disputes the allegations that produced those restrictions.

But something else is important.

The evidentiary hearing is the proceeding where the underlying factual disputes are supposed to be tested.

Nearly a year later, Flowers says that process still has not reached the point where the entire dispute has been resolved through completed evidentiary proceedings.

That delay matters because temporary decisions do not necessarily feel temporary when they remain in place month after month.

And Then There Were the Police

The story becomes even more complicated when the police records are examined.

Oakland County Sheriff's records document a November 6, 2025 child-neglect investigation.

The records say Flowers's vehicle was located through the FLOCK automated license-plate-reader network at approximately 7:30 p.m. in the Lansing area.

The same law-enforcement record lists Flowers's criminal history as:

“None.”

It also confirms that body cameras were activated during the investigation. J. Flowers FOIA 25-13116 Final…

That presents another distinction that Flowers believes has been lost during the past year:

Being investigated is not the same thing as being charged.

And being accused is not the same thing as being convicted.

The criminal child-neglect matter was eventually presented to the Oakland County Prosecutor's Office. The prosecutor declined to issue charges because of a lack of venue. Pasted markdown(20260818-191519)

That decision does not establish that every allegation against Flowers was false. A venue-based declination is not an adjudication of the underlying conduct.

But neither does the existence of the original police report establish guilt.

Both distinctions matter.

Flowers Has Been Asking Police Questions Too

Flowers says his frustration is not simply that people have made allegations.

People are allowed to report concerns to police.

His concern is what happens afterward.

He says he has repeatedly attempted to obtain records and determine the status of allegations involving him.

The documentary history supports at least part of that account.

On November 18, 2025, Flowers submitted a Freedom of Information Act request seeking the complete Wixom Police report, narratives, supplemental reports and officer notes concerning a November 6 incident. Pasted markdown(20260818-191519)

Records also establish that law enforcement possessed body-camera footage and used FLOCK information to locate Flowers's vehicle. J. Flowers FOIA 25-13116 Final…

Flowers says the existence and circulation of information about him has increasingly become a safety concern of his own.

His question is not whether police should investigate legitimate reports.

They should.

His question is:

What mechanism exists for correcting the record when an allegation is investigated but never becomes a criminal charge — or when the person accused disputes the characterization that continues circulating afterward?

One Report Becomes Another Report

That question becomes particularly significant because Sperry continued contacting law enforcement.

For example, Wixom Police records show that on March 19, 2026, Sperry made a harassment report concerning Flowers's online content, alleging that videos across several channels were threatening, targeted and erratic. Pasted markdown(20260818-191519)

Again, the distinction matters.

A police report documenting what a complainant says establishes that the statement was reported.

It does not automatically establish that the statement itself is true.

In fact, the responding officer wrote that he did not observe anything explicitly threatening in the videos he initially reviewed. 26-3572(20261002-123514)

That difference may sound obvious.

But Flowers argues that once enough reports, motions and emails accumulate, the existence of the paperwork itself can begin creating an impression of corroboration.

Person A makes an allegation.

The police document it.

An attorney references the police involvement.

A court filing references the allegation.

Another institution learns about the court case.

Eventually, someone reading only the newest document may have no idea where the original assertion actually came from.

The allegation has traveled farther than the evidence.

Flowers Says His Own Concerns Have Received Less Attention

Flowers also says there is another side of the law-enforcement story.

He has asked police for information concerning his own concerns and says the responses have been limited.

The Oakland County Sheriff's report expressly states that body cameras were activated during the November 6 investigation. J. Flowers FOIA 25-13116 Final

The same report establishes that deputies accompanied Sperry and the child to Flowers's residence and remained outside while the child entered using a key to retrieve a dog. J. Flowers FOIA 25-13116 Final

Flowers later reported that when he returned home, he believed someone had entered the residence. His December psychological evaluation independently records that account: Flowers told the evaluator that he returned home, noticed someone had entered but apparently taken nothing, and initially assumed his daughter may have entered because she had previously been given a key. Jason Flowers Dr K Report(20261…

That does not establish that a burglary occurred.

It does establish that Flowers's concern about someone entering the home was part of the documented chronology.

Flowers says he paid for and obtained body-camera material connected to the incident and has continued seeking additional information about what police knew and what conclusions were reached.

He has also asked questions about how FLOCK information concerning his vehicle was obtained, used and ultimately became known outside law enforcement.

Those are questions Buried Secrets Media is still examining.

The Psychological Evaluation Did Not Say What Some Might Expect

Another important part of the record is Flowers's psychological evaluation.

Dr. Roman Kolodchin concluded that Flowers did not suffer from a chronic mental illness and described him as being of sound mind and body, while also concluding that stress may have clouded his judgment during the November incident and recommending therapy. Jason Flowers Dr K Report

That does not erase the underlying event.

It does not mean every concern raised by others was fabricated.

But it is materially different from the broad impression that can be created when words like “mental episode,” “paranoia,” “mania,” “time travel” and “danger” are repeated without the later professional evaluation being mentioned.

And that is exactly why Flowers says context matters.

And Now It Has Reached the School

That is why Flowers considers the Walled Lake Western situation significant.

He is not simply asking whether he can stand beside a football field.

He is asking what information reached the school, who provided it, what the school independently verified, and what action the district took because of it.

Flowers says no school official has interviewed him about the underlying events.

He says he has not been provided a written determination declaring him dangerous.

He says he has not received notice that he is prohibited from attending public athletic events.

And yet correspondence now demonstrates that school officials have discussed concerns about him and circulated information internally.

That means Flowers believes the question now belongs to the institution, not merely one employee:

Is Bronson Goodsell acting independently, or is he communicating the official position of Walled Lake Consolidated Schools?

Flowers intends to ask.

The Walled Lake Central–Western Game Puts the Question Directly on the Table

Flowers, through Buried Secrets Media and its High School Football Unlimited coverage, says he intends to cover the upcoming Walled Lake Central vs. Walled Lake Western football game.

This time, however, he does not intend to leave any ambiguity.

Flowers says he will provide school and district administrators advance written notice of his intention to attend.

If the district believes he is prohibited from attending, Flowers wants that communicated before the game, in writing, along with the basis for that determination.

If there is no such restriction, he wants that clarified too.

That puts the issue where Flowers believes it should have been all along:

Out of rumor and into writing.

Meanwhile, the Legal Bills Keep Coming

There is another part of this story that is not as dramatic as time travel, police reports or school restrictions.

Money.

Family-court litigation is expensive.

Psychological evaluations cost money.

Attorney responses cost money.

Motions cost money.

Adjournments cost money.

And every additional dispute can generate another round of legal work.

The November emergency motion itself sought $2,000 in attorney fees from Flowers while simultaneously requesting that he undergo a psychiatric evaluation. Pasted markdown(20260818-195625)

The subsequent order required the psychological evaluation and initially divided its cost between the parties. Pasted markdown(20260818-195625)

Flowers says his legal expenses have continued accumulating while the underlying evidentiary dispute remains unresolved.

He is increasingly asking another uncomfortable question:

At what point does the cost of defending yourself become its own punishment?

That question should not be confused with an accusation that any attorney, court or party intentionally designed the process to financially exhaust Flowers.

Buried Secrets Media has not established evidence supporting such a conclusion.

But the financial consequence itself is real enough to ask about.

What About Flowers's Own Attorney?

Flowers's frustration is not directed solely at Sperry, Davis, police or the school district.

He has also expressed concerns regarding his own representation.

Flowers says he has repeatedly wanted fundamental questions addressed more aggressively: What evidence supports particular restrictions? Who made particular claims? What authority allowed particular information to be shared? Why hasn't the evidentiary hearing resolved these questions?

Most recently, Flowers says he attempted to address the court himself but was prevented from doing so because he was represented by counsel.

Buried Secrets Media has not independently verified that specific courtroom exchange through a transcript, so that remains Flowers's account of what occurred.

But it illustrates the larger frustration driving this story.

Flowers has an attorney.

Police have reports.

The opposing party has an attorney.

The court has filings.

The school has information.

Flowers says everybody seems to be talking about Jason Flowers while Jason Flowers continues asking when somebody is going to talk to Jason Flowers.

So... Is Jason Flowers Crazy?

That is deliberately the provocative question on the cover of this story.

And perhaps it is the wrong question.

Buried Secrets Media is not going to diagnose Jason Flowers.

Neither should Facebook.

Neither should a football coach.

Neither should an opposing litigant.

Questions concerning mental health belong to qualified professionals working from appropriate evidence, not rumor, social-media snippets or somebody's interpretation of unusual creative content.

The available records do establish that serious allegations were made.

They establish that law enforcement investigated.

They establish that a court imposed interim restrictions.

They establish that Flowers's vehicle was located using FLOCK technology.

They establish that the police record reviewed here listed no criminal history.

They establish that the prosecutor declined the child-neglect charge because of venue.

They establish that a psychological evaluation did not diagnose Flowers with chronic mental illness.

And they establish that Flowers has spent months disputing how these events have been characterized.

What they do not allow Buried Secrets Media to responsibly declare is that every allegation against Flowers has been disproven.

Flowers says they have.

That is his position.

The distinction matters.

Crazy — or Misunderstood?

Maybe the better question is not about Flowers at all.

Maybe it is about the system surrounding him.

Suppose someone makes an allegation about you.

Police document it.

An attorney obtains the report.

The allegation appears in a court motion.

An emergency order is entered before a full evidentiary hearing.

The litigation continues.

Another police report is created.

Other institutions become aware of the litigation.

A school administrator receives information about you.

And months later, you are still trying to determine exactly what everybody believes you are prohibited from doing.

At what point does an allegation quietly become treated like a fact?

And once that happens, how does the person accused correct it?

That question does not require believing Flowers.

It does not require disbelieving Sperry.

It does not require deciding today who ultimately should prevail in the underlying family-court dispute.

It requires something much simpler:

Evidence.

And an opportunity for both sides to be heard.

What Happens Next?

Buried Secrets Media will continue following the documentary record.

Flowers says he intends to ask Walled Lake Consolidated Schools directly whether any restriction prevents him from attending the Central–Western football game, what the restriction is if one exists, who authorized it, and what information the district relied upon.

The district should have an opportunity to explain its position.

Bronson Goodsell should have an opportunity to explain his.

Sperry's allegations should be identified as allegations when they have not been adjudicated.

Flowers's responses should likewise be identified as his responses when they have not been independently established.

And court orders should be reported for what they actually order, not transformed into findings they never made.

Because underneath all the strange details — football practices, FLOCK cameras, emergency motions, YouTube videos, psychological evaluations and, yes, time travel — there is a serious question here:

When an allegation becomes a police report, the police report becomes part of litigation, the litigation reaches another institution, and the accused person is still waiting for the underlying evidence to be fully heard... where does allegation end and established fact begin?

Jason Flowers says he has been asking that question for nearly a year.

Now he's asking it publicly.

EDITOR'S DISCLOSURE

Buried Secrets Media is owned by Jason Flowers, who is also the principal subject of this report. This article therefore includes Flowers's account alongside court records, police reports, emails and other documents reviewed by Buried Secrets Media.

Allegations are identified as allegations. Disputed matters are identified as disputed. Where a claim has not been independently verified, that limitation is stated.

Individuals and institutions discussed in this report are invited to provide written responses, documentation or corrections for inclusion in continuing coverage.

© 2026 Buried Secrets Media
Hosted by Value Savings Club

Affiliate Disclosure

Value Savings Club participates in affiliate marketing programs with various brands and merchants. Some links, buttons, images, banners, product listings, and other clickable elements on this website may contain affiliate tracking. If you click or interact with one of these elements and make a purchase or complete a qualifying transaction, Value Savings Club may receive a commission or other compensation at no additional cost to you.

Our affiliate relationships do not increase the price you pay. Offers, prices, discounts, availability, and terms are determined by the individual merchant and may change at any time.

Value Savings Club does not process or fulfill purchases made through affiliate promotions. When you select an offer, button, image, or other promotional element, you may be redirected to a third-party website where that merchant's terms, privacy policy, return policy, and other conditions apply.

We may receive compensation from companies featured on this website. Compensation does not guarantee a positive review, recommendation, or placement.

Value Savings Club believes in transparency. Always review the merchant's complete offer and terms before making a purchase.

One important distinction: this sitewide disclosure is useful, but it shouldn't be your only disclosure. For individual posts/pages where someone could click an affiliate button or image, a short disclosure near the promotion—such as “Affiliate link — we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you”—is the safer approach. The fact that the tracking URL is hidden behind an image or button doesn't eliminate the need for the relationship to be clear to the visitor.

Contact

admin@valuesavingsclub.com

© 2025. All rights reserved.